Stricter non-performing loan (NPL) policies proposed by Bangladesh Bank could create significant challenges for borrowers, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and exacerbate economic difficulties amid ongoing uncertainty. Experts advocate for a balanced and flexible approach, emphasizing systemic reforms and collaborative solutions rather than rigid regulations.
A Looming Crisis
The NPL issue is already a significant challenge for Bangladesh’s banking sector, with the current rate at a staggering 17%. While NPLs undeniably pose a serious threat, experts argue they are a symptom of deeper systemic issues. Addressing these root causes requires a comprehensive and strategic approach rather than hastily imposing tighter regulations.
“Reducing the grace period might force struggling borrowers into default, increasing the volume of NPLs instead of curbing it,” noted one industry expert. Many borrowers, especially those in the small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) sector, may find it impossible to meet the revised repayment timelines, leading to a domino effect of defaults and financial instability.
International Lessons in Flexibility
In developed economies, NPL management policies often exhibit greater flexibility. For instance, during recent periods of high interest rates, many Western banks adjusted repayment terms to prevent mass defaults. Borrowers were permitted to continue payments under previous terms, even if this meant temporarily deviating from standard practices.
Such measures underscore the importance of nuanced policies that balance financial discipline with economic realities. Experts question whether the IMF’s recommendations account for the unique socio-economic and institutional challenges facing Bangladesh.
Proactive Solutions Over Reactive Measures
Rather than imposing stricter classification rules, financial experts suggest prioritizing innovative solutions to manage NPLs:
- Segmenting Loans: Old NPLs with little recovery potential should be set aside temporarily, while operational businesses struggling with repayments should be offered flexible plans tailored to their financial capacity.
- Encouraging Negotiations: Borrowers and banks must work collaboratively to develop feasible repayment schedules. For instance, spreading a Tk5 crore loan over manageable monthly instalments could enable many borrowers to fulfill their obligations.
- Addressing Root Causes: Structural reforms aimed at improving governance and transparency in the banking sector are critical. Political influence in loan approvals and inadequate risk assessment mechanisms have long plagued the system, exacerbating the NPL crisis.
Economic Timing Matters
At a time when Bangladesh’s economy is under pressure, with businesses struggling to recover from global economic shocks and domestic challenges, a hardline approach to NPL recovery could be detrimental. Stricter policies risk stifling new investments, limiting economic growth, and pushing more businesses into insolvency.
“Now is not the time to tighten the noose on borrowers,” emphasized a leading economist. “What the banking sector needs is a pragmatic strategy that supports businesses while gradually resolving the NPL issue.”
A Path Forward
While reducing NPLs remains a top priority, the timing and approach must align with Bangladesh’s economic and social realities. Rigid measures could deepen the crisis rather than resolve it. A balanced strategy—focusing on recovery, reform, and resilience—is essential to navigate this complex issue without jeopardizing the broader economy.
As the government and central bank weigh their options, experts call for thoughtful deliberation to ensure policies foster long-term stability rather than immediate turmoil.
FAQs
- What is the proposed change in loan classification by Bangladesh Bank?
- The proposed policy would classify loans as non-performing if repayments are delayed by more than three months, down from the current six-month grace period.
- Why are experts concerned about the stricter NPL policies?
- Experts fear that reducing the grace period will force struggling borrowers into default, increasing the volume of NPLs and creating further financial instability.
- What alternative measures do experts suggest?
- Experts suggest segmenting loans, encouraging negotiations between borrowers and banks, and addressing root causes through governance and transparency reforms.
- How do international practices differ in NPL management?
- Developed economies often adopt more flexible NPL management policies, such as adjusting repayment terms during economic uncertainty to prevent mass defaults.
- Why is the timing of stricter NPL policies critical?
- Bangladesh’s economy is currently under pressure from global and domestic challenges. Stricter policies could stifle new investments and lead to further economic instability.
0 Comments